I've often wondered the particulars of the MKL; I have licensed via Enthought and distributed compiled works to client(s), and often use C. Gohkle's distros myself. - Ray At 05:29 PM 3/26/2014, you wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi,

Can I check what is stopping us building official numpy binary wheels for Windows using the Intel Math Kernel Library?

* We'd need developer licenses, but those sound like they would be easy to come by * We'd have to add something to the license for the wheel on the lines of the Canopy license [1], derived from the MKL license [2] - is that a problem?

Are there other problems for numpy?

Talking with Fernando, we identified these as being the key problem clauses in the MKL license [1]:

<start quote> D. DISTRIBUTION: Distribution of the Redistributables is also subject to the following limitations: [snipped clauses] (iv) shall use a license agreement that prohibits disassembly and reverse engineering of the Redistributables, (v) shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Intel and its suppliers from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorney's fees, that arise or result from your distribution of any product. </end quote>

The first is a problem that might conceivably be adequately solved by adding a paragraph to the Pypi page for numpy ("If you download and install the windows binaries, you also agree... ") and copying a new clause into the license in the installed tree. Maybe. The second looks like it would be very hard to deal with for open source project like us....

Cheers (sadly),

Matthew

[1] http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-development-products... _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion