On 10/23/2009 09:39 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:25:12 -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:

...

Is there a way to use numpydoc without putting an autosummary table at the head of each class? I'm using numpydoc primarily for the sectionized docstring support, but the autosummaries are somewhat overkill for my project.

Ah, you meant the stuff output by default to class docstrings. Currently, there's no way to turn this off, unfortunately. It seems there should be, though...

Exactly. It would be great if there was a conf.py option (or something) to turn this off. Thanks for considering it. Cheers, Mike

Done. Issue #50. Thanks, Mike On 10/23/2009 02:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:

The proper thing to do is file an "enhancement" ticket, at:

http://code.google.com/p/pydocweb/issues/list

Thanks.

DG

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Droettboom mailto:mdroe@stsci.edu> wrote:

On 10/23/2009 09:39 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:25:12 -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote: > >> Is there a way to use numpydoc without putting an autosummary table at >> the head of each class? I'm using numpydoc primarily for the >> sectionized docstring support, but the autosummaries are somewhat >> overkill for my project. >> > Ah, you meant the stuff output by default to class docstrings. Currently, > there's no way to turn this off, unfortunately. It seems there should be, > though... > > Exactly. It would be great if there was a conf.py option (or something) to turn this off. Thanks for considering it.

Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org mailto:NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion