Re: [Pydotorg-www] [Pydotorg] [Pydotorg-checkins] r9943 - trunk/beta.python.org/build
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 23:42 +0200, Johannes Gijsbers wrote:
Indeed, you're right. I hadn't even considered that. I'm currently looking at not using the needUnicode argument altogether, because BeautifulSoup automatically outputs unicode if all the data put into it is using Unicode. Will let you know later.
It doesn't seem to be a problem to remove the unicode argument. BeautifulSoup is outputting the unicode type anyway. Tim, any objections? Would it be okay to have these discussions on pydotorg-www from now on? Johannes
Johannes Gijsbers wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 23:42 +0200, Johannes Gijsbers wrote:
Indeed, you're right. I hadn't even considered that. I'm currently looking at not using the needUnicode argument altogether, because BeautifulSoup automatically outputs unicode if all the data put into it is using Unicode. Will let you know later.
It doesn't seem to be a problem to remove the unicode argument. BeautifulSoup is outputting the unicode type anyway. Tim, any objections?
I don't think so... It solved a problem at the time because utf8 wasn't being handled correctly.. It sounds like BS is a little more forgiveing now. It's probably worth checking on a page with lots of umlauts, cedillas, graves, acutes, etc just to ensure we're not getting any cross-encoding errors. If that works fine then it should be OK. Tim
participants (2)
-
Johannes Gijsbers -
Tim Parkin