+1, but kind of abstain. I'm not sure which project has me as a committer (please not distutils...), but I'm unlikely to be involved in any sponsorship arrangements. The only opinion I have is "better the PSF than another org," but I'm trusting that others have determined that there is a need for a fiscal sponsor. Cheers, Steve On 9/30/2020 2:00 PM, Dustin Ingram wrote:
As a result of the discussion at https://discuss.python.org/t/pypa-as-a-psf-fiscal-sponsoree/4939/, I'm calling for a vote on the following proposal:
I propose that the Python Packaging Authority become a Fiscal Sponsoree of the Python Software Foundation.
Per PEP 609, a vote is triggered when a PyPA committer (not the proposer) seconds the proposal. Afterwards, this proposal will be put to a vote on this mailing list over a 7 day period. Each PyPA committer (member of this list) can vote once, and can choose one of +1 and -1. If at least two thirds of voters vote +1, then the vote succeeds.
This list currently has 39 members, so we will need 26 votes of +1 to pass.