+1

In PEP 609, we moved the PyPA to use the PSF's Code of Conduct, but we left in place a PyPA-specific CoC team. 

I'd like to propose moving our reporting procedure to use the same procedure as the rest of the PSF. Practically this means that we'd dreprecate the conduct@pypa.io alias and reports would go right to conduct-wg@python.org instead.

A few advantages:

• The PyPA is not a 'special case' for PSF projects when it comes to CoCs
• The CoC team would include unbiased members that aren't part of the PyPA
• Better response time, and more experience around response procedure, etc.

Given that PEP 609 doesn't actually talk about the conduct@pypa.io intermediary, this might not be considered an "Update to the Governance/Specification Processes", but I'd like to propose a vote on this anyway.

Reminder that a PyPA committer vote is triggered when a PyPA committer (not the proposer) seconds the proposal.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
PyPA-Committers mailing list -- pypa-committers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pypa-committers-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pypa-committers.python.org/
Member address: opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de