30 Sep
2020
30 Sep
'20
8:48 a.m.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 15:43, Paul Ganssle
Clarifying question about how PEP 609 is to be interpreted. The text is ambiguous in that it says "If at least two thirds of voters vote +1, then the vote succeeds." If I am reading you right, you seem to be interpreting voters to mean "anyone who has a right to vote", but I had interpreted it as "anyone who casts a vote".
I agree. IMO, if the PEP had intended "two thirds of anyone who has a right to vote" it would have said "two thirds of PyPA committers". However, we could do with protection against too few people voting (a vote is invalid unless at least xx% of PyPA committers cast a vote, maybe?) Paul