Brett has volunteered as PEP delegate for PEP 639 (Improving license clarity with better package metadata). The process says: """ If their self-nomination is accepted by the other PyPA core reviewers, the lead PyPI maintainer and the default PEP-Delegate for package distribution metadata PEPs, then they will have the authority to approve (or reject) that PEP. """ It's not 100% clear to me how we get that acceptance, so I'm posting here to give anyone who wants to, a chance to object. In the absence of any specific comment in the process, I'll give it a week and then if there's no objections, assume that Brett will be PEP delegate. If anyone thinks approving PEP delegate volunteers should be handled differently, please say so. I'm just guessing as to what's reasonable here :-) Paul