Brett has volunteered as PEP delegate for PEP 639 (Improving license
clarity with better package metadata). The process says:

"""
If their self-nomination is accepted by the other PyPA core reviewers,
the lead PyPI maintainer and the default PEP-Delegate for package
distribution metadata PEPs, then they will have the authority to
approve (or reject) that PEP.
"""

It's not 100% clear to me how we get that acceptance, so I'm posting
here to give anyone who wants to, a chance to object. In the absence
of any specific comment in the process, I'll give it a week and then
if there's no objections, assume that Brett will be PEP delegate.

If anyone thinks approving PEP delegate volunteers should be handled
differently, please say so. I'm just guessing as to what's reasonable
here :-)

Paul
_______________________________________________
PyPA-Committers mailing list -- pypa-committers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pypa-committers-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pypa-committers.python.org/
Member address: brett@python.org