On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Toby St Clere Smithe <mail@tsmithe.net> wrote:
Hi Yury,
"Yury V. Zaytsev" <yury@shurup.com> writes:
Did you actually try it?
Hah, no! I wasn't that optimistic!
I have found that cpyext has seen huge improvements in the last years. This summer, I've managed to compile some rather complex Cython-generated code with minor manual changes...
This certainly sounds promising. I'll give it a go in the next couple of weeks, and report back (unless anyone else pipes up warning me not to). If I can get boost::python to build against PyPy, that will be very pleasing.
Cheers,
Toby
Hi I'm less optimistic. Boost::Python uses tons of internal stuff as far as I know. We really discourage people from using it, because it's a) slow b) prone to not behave exactly like CPython and c) be incomplete. Cheers, fijal