24 Mar
2016
24 Mar
'16
11:20 a.m.
Hi John, On 24 March 2016 at 13:22, John Camara <john.m.camara@gmail.com> wrote:
(...) Thus the need for a jffi library.
When I hear "a jffi library" I'm thinking about a new library with a new API. I think what you would really like instead is to keep the existing libraries, but adapt them internally to allow tighter execution of the Python and Java VMs. I may be completely wrong about that, but you're also talking to the wrong guys in the first place :-) A bientôt, Armin.