yes, it's not a typo but "not a merge blocker". I'll reenable them once we decide what to do now On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, fijal <noreply@buildbot.pypy.org> wrote:
Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> Branch: Changeset: r79543:3c45f447b1e3 Date: 2015-09-08 15:11 +0200 http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/3c45f447b1e3/
Log: (fijal, arigo) merge optresult-unroll - this branch improves warmup by about 20% by changing the underlaying structure of the ResOperations by killing Boxes. It also rewrites unrolling to something (hopefully) a bit saner
diff too long, truncating to 2000 out of 44326 lines
diff --git a/pypy/goal/targetpypystandalone.py b/pypy/goal/targetpypystandalone.py --- a/pypy/goal/targetpypystandalone.py +++ b/pypy/goal/targetpypystandalone.py @@ -341,8 +341,8 @@
def jitpolicy(self, driver): from pypy.module.pypyjit.policy import PyPyJitPolicy - from pypy.module.pypyjit.hooks import pypy_hooks - return PyPyJitPolicy(pypy_hooks) + #from pypy.module.pypyjit.hooks import pypy_hooks + return PyPyJitPolicy()#pypy_hooks)
is still intended or just a typo? I suspect this disables pypyjit.set_compile_hook etc?
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev