
Laura Creighton wrote: [snipped almost all, totally agreed]
The best one will be determined by things like 'can Armin and Christian make it go _really fast_, which is something we aren't supposed to be thinking about now. (Though its hard not to sometimes. :-) )
My problem is simply that we are too abstract for my taste, yet. I'd like to build abstraction with concrete implementation at the same time, because I need a proof of concept, early. What I need is one long line from the very upper levels, which I like very much, down to the primitive code that *really* implements it in some way not les efficient that CPython. I need t get my "environment definitions", to be able to work on that ground level. But I agree that we shouldn't stick with only repeating CPython, so there is a need for different abstraction levels, which are maybe missing in the current picture. cheers - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/