Which source files/functions/line numbers should I take a look at, as specifically as possible?

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Steven Jackson
<stevenjackson121@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am definitely open to working on Numpy first, my only hesitation was that
> it might be hard to get spun up, and scipy seemed like something I could
> slice off and do (some of) by myself without accidentally conflicting with
> ongoing development efforts.
>
> If, as your replies have indicated, Numpy isn't being very actively
> developed, and it would be easy to get caught up and avoid conflicting with
> other developers, then I'd be glad to help there instead of independently
> trying to get scipy going.

That sounds very good to me. The thing I started (and I'm not actively
working on it for at least a week or two more) is to clean up stuff
and try to reuse pure-python numpy part without changes

>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Daπid <davidmenhur@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I believe the reason is that they prefer to focus the development
>> effort into the more "basic" Numpy and from that go on. Numpy is not
>> fully implemented
>>
>> I am working (actually, right now I am only in the "thinking" state)
>> on some modules of NumPy, maybe we could coordinate and give this a
>> boost.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Steven Jackson
>> <stevenjackson121@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I know there is no current plan to implement scipy in pypy, but
>> > searching
>> > the PyPy website, I was not able to find the reason.
>> >
>> > If it is not to be included as a feature due to lack of interest or
>> > developer time, I am offering to begin rewriting scipy in pure python (I
>> > have quite a bit of free time to do this).
>> > If it has been discussed and actively excluded from pypy, I would like
>> > to
>> > know that before I waste too much time rewriting it.
>> >
>> > I have an active interest in being able to use some modules which depend
>> > on
>> > scipy while using the PyPy interpreter (especially pyBrain). I have seen
>> > the
>> > hack on the pypy blog:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2011/12/plotting-using-matplotlib-from-pypy.html
>> >
>> > I could simply use the hack myself, but unless there's a reason not too,
>> > I
>> > think it'd be nice to have scipy available as a pure python module
>> > (perhaps
>> > called scipypy in the same manner as numpy).
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steven Jackson
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > pypy-dev mailing list
>> > pypy-dev@python.org
>> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Jackson
>
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>



--
Steven Jackson