![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2f2ca3900ef33896dbd5d158c803d4bd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Aug. 2, 2011
8:20 a.m.
hi Alex, hi all, I don't have much time for things, about to leave on vacation. Just so that it doesn't get lost: on the unrolling-if branch, if you use the decorator, the JIT should *not* look inside the function if the condition if false. even if the function doesn't contain a loop. so maybe the decorators should be renamed to unroll_iff (too mathematical?) or unroll_exactly_if. Cheers, Carl Friedrich