Re: [pypy-dev] Change to the frontpage of speed.pypy.org
In a message of Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:57:33 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski writes:
This sounds good to me as well, and I too don't want Miquel to think that I am ungrateful for all his hard work. The site is really good for us, and thank you. Laura
Hi all, hey, it's not like I crumble at the sound of the slightest criticism ;-) Open Source is about this. Ideas, feedback, etc. Only then can we get better! I think I can draw two conclusions: - For Pycon, and maybe permanently, a general comparison against CPython or an overall timeline would be better. I see I have about 1 week to come up with something. - If Maciej, who obviously is a developer, doesn't think that the report, or "recent results" feature is useful, that means that at the very least it needs tweaking. I will think and experiment with different possibilities. For one I will increase the threshold again, to 5 o 6% so that there is a higher signal to noise ratio. I can also imagine showing two numbers: one for the biggest improvement and one for the biggest regression. And maybe the average. We'll see. If anyone has a clear idea of how that could become more useful please share. Cheers, Miquel 2011/2/27 Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Miquel Torres <tobami@googlemail.com> wrote:
My biggest issue is with the fact that they show up and just stay. This means there is no way to distinguish between "I've seen this" or "I didn't see this" which make it useless.
Hi all, hey, it's not like I crumble at the sound of the slightest criticism ;-) Open Source is about this. Ideas, feedback, etc. Only then can we get better! I think I can draw two conclusions: - For Pycon, and maybe permanently, a general comparison against CPython or an overall timeline would be better. I see I have about 1 week to come up with something. - If Maciej, who obviously is a developer, doesn't think that the report, or "recent results" feature is useful, that means that at the very least it needs tweaking. I will think and experiment with different possibilities. For one I will increase the threshold again, to 5 o 6% so that there is a higher signal to noise ratio. I can also imagine showing two numbers: one for the biggest improvement and one for the biggest regression. And maybe the average. We'll see. If anyone has a clear idea of how that could become more useful please share. Cheers, Miquel 2011/2/27 Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Miquel Torres <tobami@googlemail.com> wrote:
My biggest issue is with the fact that they show up and just stay. This means there is no way to distinguish between "I've seen this" or "I didn't see this" which make it useless.
participants (3)
-
Laura Creighton -
Maciej Fijalkowski -
Miquel Torres