Worrying set of checkins
Anyone feeling like looking into this: http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit ?
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com>:
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit
This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT. the pypy-c-jit figures are more positive. -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com>:
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit
This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT. the pypy-c-jit figures are more positive.
-- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Yes. Still, worth looking into.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> wrote:
2011/2/1 Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com>:
Anyone feeling like looking into this:
http://speed.pypy.org/changes/?tre=10&rev=41510:77f94f44989a&exe=3&env=tannit
This show benchmarks for pypy *without* JIT. the pypy-c-jit figures are more positive.
-- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Yes. Still, worth looking into.
Well, false alarms. Next run nulled out those changes.
participants (2)
-
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc -
Maciej Fijalkowski