Please update the buildbot
Could someone with access update and cycle the buildbot when they get the chance? Thanks, -- Philip Jenvey
Armin: I don't understand how buildbots work too well, but on this page: http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32 It seems that Philip scheduled a build 38 hours ago and it hasn't started. We want it to be built. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Armin Rigo <arigo@tunes.org> wrote:
Hi Philip,
Could someone with access update and cycle the buildbot when they get
On 16 October 2014 21:19, Philip Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org> wrote: the chance?
Updated it one or two days ago. It is at current tip (a768fa781d1b).
Armin _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
both slaves are offline, pester the admins to bring them back (I've no clue who, matti maybe?) On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
Armin: I don't understand how buildbots work too well, but on this page:
http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32
It seems that Philip scheduled a build 38 hours ago and it hasn't started. We want it to be built.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Armin Rigo <arigo@tunes.org> wrote:
Hi Philip,
On 16 October 2014 21:19, Philip Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org> wrote:
Could someone with access update and cycle the buildbot when they get the chance?
Updated it one or two days ago. It is at current tip (a768fa781d1b).
Armin _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Matti, are you the admin of the build slaves? On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
both slaves are offline, pester the admins to bring them back (I've no clue who, matti maybe?)
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
Armin: I don't understand how buildbots work too well, but on this page:
http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32
It seems that Philip scheduled a build 38 hours ago and it hasn't started. We want it to be built.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Armin Rigo <arigo@tunes.org> wrote:
Hi Philip,
On 16 October 2014 21:19, Philip Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org> wrote:
Could someone with access update and cycle the buildbot when they get the chance?
Updated it one or two days ago. It is at current tip (a768fa781d1b).
Armin _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On 18/10/14 04:36, Ram Rachum wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com <mailto:fijall@gmail.com>> wrote:
both slaves are offline, pester the admins to bring them back (I've no clue who, matti maybe?)
> _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org <mailto:pypy-dev@python.org> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >
I restarted the windows buildslave Matti
Thanks Matti. Philip, it looks like our build failed, right? On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/10/14 04:36, Ram Rachum wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com <mailto:fijall@gmail.com>> wrote:
both slaves are offline, pester the admins to bring them back (I've no clue who, matti maybe?)
> _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org <mailto:pypy-dev@python.org> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >
I restarted the windows buildslave Matti
No, wait another couple of hours for the build to finish. You are looking at the default build, yours is the py3.3 build that is waiting in line, that's what the "lock" is on this page http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32/builds/1607 Note that it will definitely not pass all tests, the best you can hope for is that translation and upload succeed Matti
Thanks Matti! I'll wait and hope for the best. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:49 PM, matti picus <matti.picus@gmail.com> wrote:
No, wait another couple of hours for the build to finish. You are looking at the default build, yours is the py3.3 build that is waiting in line, that's what the "lock" is on this page http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32/builds/1607
Note that it will definitely not pass all tests, the best you can hope for is that translation and upload succeed
Matti
I see that the translation failed... Damn. What I want is to test the package I'm going to release soon on the 3.3 version of Pypy to make sure there are no bugs. I'm not technical enough to compile/install it on Linux. So I guess I'll wait for a Windows binary to be released. Thanks, Ram. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Ram Rachum <ram@rachum.com> wrote:
Thanks Matti! I'll wait and hope for the best.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:49 PM, matti picus <matti.picus@gmail.com> wrote:
No, wait another couple of hours for the build to finish. You are looking at the default build, yours is the py3.3 build that is waiting in line, that's what the "lock" is on this page http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-win-x86-32/builds/1607
Note that it will definitely not pass all tests, the best you can hope for is that translation and upload succeed
Matti
participants (6)
-
Armin Rigo -
Maciej Fijalkowski -
matti picus -
Matti Picus
-
Philip Jenvey -
Ram Rachum