I agree that new approaches to concurrency would be cool. Possible SoCers might start by looking at PARELY (an actor model impl for python that runs on PyPy as is). http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley/ Regards, Paul On 3/18/08, Jakub Gustak <jgustak@gmail.com> wrote:
What do you all think of these ideas? Are there other ideas around? I know that Jakub posted something a while ago (haven't looked in detail yet, though). In my opinion we should try to avoid "yet another incomplete interpreter implentation" for this year.
I fully agree.
Still, what I proposed was not attempt to create another one, but keep existing one alive. It is bothering me, that scheme interpreter is incomplete, but the problem is, i could not find a use case for it (except of Thousand Parsecs internal scripting language - if none other - faster - scheme implementation available).
So if PyPy is such a nice platform to experiment, let's do it, and play with different approaches to implement parallel paradigms, or whatsoever. There is no need for yet another scheme interpreter (even complete) if it doesn't have any interesting features. That's my 3 cents for now.
Cheers,
Jakub Gustak
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
participants (1)
-
Paul deGrandis