Developer selection for Py3k and Numpy
Hi all, Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution. Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k). Based on these answers we will then select and announce developers to work on the proposals. The work will be started at the upcoming Gothenburg sprint. Cheers, Carl Friedrich [1] http://pypy.org/numpydonate.html [2] http://pypy.org/py3donate.html
2011/10/18 Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfbolz@gmx.de>:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Please consider me to have stepped forward. :) -- Regards, Benjamin
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>wrote:
2011/10/18 Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfbolz@gmx.de>:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Please consider me to have stepped forward. :)
-- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I'm interested in the py3k work. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:21 -0400, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/10/18 Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfbolz@gmx.de>:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Please consider me to have stepped forward. :)
for py3k, i assume. holger
2011/10/18 holger krekel <holger@merlinux.eu>:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:21 -0400, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/10/18 Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfbolz@gmx.de>:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Please consider me to have stepped forward. :)
for py3k, i assume.
Indeed. -- Regards, Benjamin
On 18/10/11 13:40, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
I'd like to be considered to help implementing the Py3k proposal. ciao, Anto
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/10/11 13:40, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
I'd like to be considered to help implementing the Py3k proposal.
ciao, Anto _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I would like to be considered for both (with the slight preference for numpy).
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/10/11 13:40, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
I'd like to be considered to help implementing the Py3k proposal.
ciao, Anto _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I would like to be considered for both (with the slight preference for numpy).
I meant I would like to work on both py3k and numpy proposal and if there is a choice I would prefer numpy. Cheers, fijal
On 10/18/2011 01:40 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Based on these answers we will then select and announce developers to work on the proposals. The work will be started at the upcoming Gothenburg sprint.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
consider me for py3k as well, pyrepl will be some effort to get reasonable -- Ronny
[1] http://pypy.org/numpydonate.html [2] http://pypy.org/py3donate.html _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
On 10/18/2011 01:40 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Now that we are getting in some money for our Py3k [1] and Numpy [2] funding proposals (thank you very very much, for everybody who contributed!) it is time to think more concretely about the actual execution.
Therefore I want to ask for PyPy developers that are interested in getting paid for their work on the first steps of the Numpy or Py3k proposals to step forward. To be applicable you need to be an experienced PyPy developer who worked in this area before (Numpy) or on the Python interpreter (Py3k).
Hi all, wanted to follow up on this. The selected developers for the first phases are: Py3k phase 1.1: Antonio Cuni has been a core developer of PyPy for 5 years, and has worked in many areas of the project, including the Python interpreter, the backends and the JIT compiler generator. He has a deep knowledge of the source code, and thus he is well suited to do the work to implement Python 3 in PyPy. Maciej Fijałkowski is a long time PyPy core developer and has participated in the development of the Python interpreter since 2006. He helped with the move from interpreter version from Python 2.4 to 2.5 as well as 2.5 to 2.7. He also worked a lot on extension modules, like ctypes. Thus he is well suited to implement Python 3 in PyPy. Alex Gaynor has been contributing to PyPy for 1.5 years. He has worked on many parts of PyPy, including the JIT, interpreter, translator, and some modules. He helped doing the port to 2.7, including writing the _io module implementation, making him well-suited to work on the Python 3-effort. Benjamin Peterson played a major role in porting PyPy to Python 2.7. His understanding of the PyPy codebase is very broad. He is also a CPython core developer and played a crucial role in implementing Python 3 there, which makes him an ideal candidate for helping the equivalent effort in PyPy. Numpy phase 1: Maciej Fijałkowski started developing the Numpy experiments done in PyPy in 2009. He also created the first version of arrays that were used for this experiment. He is also one of the maintainers of the x86 JIT-backend which makes him suitable for work on the performance front. Cheers, Carl Friedrich
participants (7)
-
Alex Gaynor
-
Antonio Cuni
-
Benjamin Peterson
-
Carl Friedrich Bolz
-
holger krekel
-
Maciej Fijalkowski
-
Ronny Pfannschmidt