I think the discussion becomes very interesting with more things written about HPy, in particular by members of the C API working group. It would really be interesting to have the points of view of HPy, PyPy and GraalPy developers. For example about things like:

...

It seems to me that the HPy project demonstrated that this is technically doable and an attractive strategy.

As have numerous others, yes. SWIG, pybind11, Cython, nanobind, and PyO3 all come immediately to mind. HPy hasn’t really demonstrated anything new beyond those, apart from it being possible at a lower abstraction level.

----- Mail original -----

De: "PIERRE AUGIER" <pierre.augier@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> À: "hpy-dev" <hpy-dev@python.org> Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Avril 2025 22:35:58 Objet: FYI: question related to HPy on discuss.python.org

FYI, I asked a question related to HPy on discuss.python.org and got interesting answers from CPython core devs:

https://discuss.python.org/t/c-api-working-group-and-plan-to-get-a-python-c-...