Hi David, the FreeBSD buildslave now has appropriate env flags (MAKEFLAGS=-j8) which seems to solve the issue without patching .. /Tobias

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: David Naylor [mailto:naylor.b.david@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 10:41 An: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: Tobias Oberstein; pypy-dev@python.org Betreff: Re: [pypy-dev] FreeBSD 9.2 buildslave: first run

On Sunday, 17 November 2013 19:09:00 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:

...

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Tobias Oberstein

<tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:

...

Hi,

the new FreeBSD buildslave has run the first time:

http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-freebsd-9-x86-64/builds /6

PyPy was built successfully, but there are a couple of issues:

https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1637 https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1638 https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1639

I'll address those.

There is another issue that bugs me .. look at the built times:

[Timer] Timings: [Timer] annotate --- 576.0 s [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1323.7 s [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 1098.6 s [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 314.2 s [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 161.5 s [Timer] database_c --- 451.3 s [Timer] source_c --- 668.5 s [Timer] compile_c --- 2403.8 s [Timer] =========================================== [Timer] Total: --- 6997.6 s

and compare with "Linux 64 on allegro64":

[Timer] Timings: [Timer] annotate --- 641.5 s [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1528.5 s [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 938.7 s [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 242.2 s [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 206.8 s [Timer] database_c --- 325.3 s [Timer] source_c --- 357.7 s [Timer] compile_c --- 246.4 s [Timer] =========================================== [Timer] Total: --- 4487.1 s

*****

Why the heck does "compile_c" take 10x the time on FreeBSD?

Note that FreeBSD builder uses Clang .. could that be a reason?

Any hints on that are welcome!

Cheers, Tobias

_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

I would guess because we can't guess the number of processors we don't parallelize the build correctly.

Hi,

Please see attached for a patch that fixes this. It should be trivial to add support for the other bsd systems, however I am not sure where the other bsds put their sysctl.

Tobias: can you please confirm if this patch works (please make sure there is no MAKEFLAGS specified). The Ports Collection invokes the Makefile directly so never needed this.

Regards

Hi David, the FreeBSD buildslave now has appropriate env flags (MAKEFLAGS=-j8) which seems to solve the issue without patching .. /Tobias

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: David Naylor [mailto:naylor.b.david@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 10:41 An: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: Tobias Oberstein; pypy-dev@python.org Betreff: Re: [pypy-dev] FreeBSD 9.2 buildslave: first run

On Sunday, 17 November 2013 19:09:00 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:

...

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Tobias Oberstein

<tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:

...

Hi,

the new FreeBSD buildslave has run the first time:

http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-freebsd-9-x86-64/builds /6

PyPy was built successfully, but there are a couple of issues:

https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1637 https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1638 https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1639

I'll address those.

There is another issue that bugs me .. look at the built times:

[Timer] Timings: [Timer] annotate --- 576.0 s [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1323.7 s [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 1098.6 s [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 314.2 s [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 161.5 s [Timer] database_c --- 451.3 s [Timer] source_c --- 668.5 s [Timer] compile_c --- 2403.8 s [Timer] =========================================== [Timer] Total: --- 6997.6 s

and compare with "Linux 64 on allegro64":

[Timer] Timings: [Timer] annotate --- 641.5 s [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1528.5 s [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 938.7 s [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 242.2 s [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 206.8 s [Timer] database_c --- 325.3 s [Timer] source_c --- 357.7 s [Timer] compile_c --- 246.4 s [Timer] =========================================== [Timer] Total: --- 4487.1 s

*****

Why the heck does "compile_c" take 10x the time on FreeBSD?

Note that FreeBSD builder uses Clang .. could that be a reason?

Any hints on that are welcome!

Cheers, Tobias

_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

I would guess because we can't guess the number of processors we don't parallelize the build correctly.

Hi,

Please see attached for a patch that fixes this. It should be trivial to add support for the other bsd systems, however I am not sure where the other bsds put their sysctl.

Tobias: can you please confirm if this patch works (please make sure there is no MAKEFLAGS specified). The Ports Collection invokes the Makefile directly so never needed this.

Regards