[proposal] experiment with adapting gitmate.io for automating issue maintenance/triaging tasks
Hi Everyone, a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i do certain things at work, they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done for pytest: https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue triaging to start and use such a tool. -- Ronny
Howdy Ronny, On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i do certain things at work,
they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done for pytest:
https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest
i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue triaging to start and use such a tool.
Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful. I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us. [1] https://gitmate.io/features Cheers, Bruno
-- Ronny _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
i propose that unless someone vetos, i'll take a look into activating it for pytest-dev/pytest on monday. -- Ronny Am Freitag, den 08.12.2017, 18:12 +0000 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Howdy Ronny,
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <opensource@ronnypf annschmidt.de> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand
their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i
do certain things at work,
they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done
for pytest:
https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpyt est
i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue
triaging to start and use such a tool.
Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful.
I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us.
[1] https://gitmate.io/features
Cheers,Bruno
-- Ronny
_______________________________________________
pytest-dev mailing list
pytest-dev@python.org
Sounds good, thanks. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:
i propose that unless someone vetos, i'll take a look into activating it for pytest-dev/pytest on monday.
-- Ronny
Am Freitag, den 08.12.2017, 18:12 +0000 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Howdy Ronny,
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt < opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i do certain things at work,
they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done for pytest:
https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest
i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue triaging to start and use such a tool.
Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful.
I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us.
[1] https://gitmate.io/features
Cheers, Bruno
-- Ronny _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
Hi Everyone, i enabled gitmate for pytest-dev/pytest, currently its set up in the default settings - and as far as i can tell there are quite some nice opt-in's id like to experiment with in future. -- Ronny Am 08.12.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Sounds good, thanks.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de <mailto:opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de>> wrote:
i propose that unless someone vetos, i'll take a look into activating it for pytest-dev/pytest on monday.
-- Ronny
Am Freitag, den 08.12.2017, 18:12 +0000 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
Howdy Ronny,
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de <mailto:opensource@ronnypfannschmidt.de>> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
a while back the people behind gitmate.io <http://gitmate.io> did interview me to expand their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i do certain things at work,
they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done for pytest:
https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest
i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue triaging to start and use such a tool.
Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful.
I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us.
[1] https://gitmate.io/features
Cheers, Bruno
-- Ronny _______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org <mailto:pytest-dev@python.org> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:10:54AM +0100, RonnyPfannschmidt wrote:
Hi Everyone,
i enabled gitmate for pytest-dev/pytest,
currently its set up in the default settings - and as far as i can tell there are quite some nice opt-in's id like to experiment with in future.
Just enabled it for qutebrowser as well, and the first thing it did is adding a comment to the first issue I opened after enabling it, in my name, without any indication that it's not from me: https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/3378#issuecomment-35070099... Could've sent a mail or something, or at the very least indicate where the comment is from - this is definitely the worst way to do something like this. YMMV, but I'm quite close to just turning it off again for qutebrowser... Florian -- https://www.qutebrowser.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
Hey, GitMate seemed quite useful so far! However, the "the contributor most likely able to help you" messages seemed quite a lot of noise to me. Also, they only pinged people who are subscribed to the repository anyways, and are already doing a lot of work either way. I took the freedom to turn that off. Maybe it makes sense to turn it on and blacklist core contributors (as those watch the repo presumably) so it can highlight the right people in cases where there's really another contributor who developed a certain feature. However, in the qutebrowser repo, it just started highlighting people with seemingly no connection to the issues ;-) Florian -- https://www.qutebrowser.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
thanks for that feedback, i presume you also fed it to git-mate since they are eager to fix their product -- Ronny 2018-01-18 8:53 GMT+01:00 Florian Bruhin <me@the-compiler.org>:
Hey,
GitMate seemed quite useful so far! However, the "the contributor most likely able to help you" messages seemed quite a lot of noise to me. Also, they only pinged people who are subscribed to the repository anyways, and are already doing a lot of work either way.
I took the freedom to turn that off. Maybe it makes sense to turn it on and blacklist core contributors (as those watch the repo presumably) so it can highlight the right people in cases where there's really another contributor who developed a certain feature. However, in the qutebrowser repo, it just started highlighting people with seemingly no connection to the issues ;-)
Florian
-- https://www.qutebrowser.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
_______________________________________________ pytest-dev mailing list pytest-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
-- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander
participants (5)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Florian Bruhin -
Ronny Pfannschmidt -
Ronny Pfannschmidt -
RonnyPfannschmidt