-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Coghlan wrote:
Gerhard Häring wrote:
Christian Heimes wrote:
Can you do me a favor? Can you port the patch to 3.0 for me? I'm getting lots of conflicts with svnmerge.py. You know the code base for the sqlite module much better than me.
I will of course do that, but it will take some time. Adapting to the C API changes in 3.0 is not so trivial for me.
Is this something that would be better left until after the Grand Renaming, Python 3 Edition? (I know it isn't even close to the scope of the original grand renaming that added the P[yY] prefixes to everything,
I know nothing about that, yet. Is there a PEP I can read or something?
but renaming PyUnicode/String/Bytes is still going to touch an awful lot of code).
... but if it's going to involve this, I'd like to defer adapting the sqlite3 module, because this is exactly the "problem area" here. - -- Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHyrTedIO4ozGCH14RAi3tAKCKHAfP999MgRwlV4CJj46hCxmVLQCfZtsJ zgxMCPbmrFi2USGUDw9A768= =zdqt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----