This looks more like the older "someone has to be watching to tell if it failed" format. Much better than nothing, but not the goal. If you're checking in what you already have, great; if you're writing new, try to make it auto-checkable (though this is still much better than nothing.) -jJ On 8/27/06, jackilyn.hoxworth <python-checkins@python.org> wrote:
Author: jackilyn.hoxworth Date: Mon Aug 28 02:22:37 2006 New Revision: 51629
Added: python/branches/hoxworth-stdlib_logging-soc/test_smtpd_logging.py Log:
Added: python/branches/hoxworth-stdlib_logging-soc/test_smtpd_logging.py ============================================================================== --- (empty file) +++ python/branches/hoxworth-stdlib_logging-soc/test_smtpd_logging.py Mon Aug 28 02:22:37 2006 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +import smtpd +import logging +from cStringIO import StringIO + +# ... run the tests ... +log=logging.getLogger("py.smtpd") +stringLog = StringIO() + +# define the handler and level +handler = logging.StreamHandler(stringLog) +log.setLevel(logging.INFO) + +# add the handler to the logger +log.addHandler(handler) + +smtpd._log.info("message 1") + +print stringLog.getvalue() # For testing purposes + +if stringLog.getvalue() != "Error: It worked": + print "it worked" +else: + print "it didn't work" \ No newline at end of file _______________________________________________ Python-checkins mailing list Python-checkins@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins