r86857 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/_abcoll.py Lib/test/test_collections.py Misc/NEWS
Author: raymond.hettinger Date: Mon Nov 29 04:56:12 2010 New Revision: 86857 Log: Issue #10565: Iterator ABC should require both __next__ and __iter__. Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/_abcoll.py python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_collections.py python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/_abcoll.py ============================================================================== --- python/branches/py3k/Lib/_abcoll.py (original) +++ python/branches/py3k/Lib/_abcoll.py Mon Nov 29 04:56:12 2010 @@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ @classmethod def __subclasshook__(cls, C): if cls is Iterator: - if any("__next__" in B.__dict__ for B in C.__mro__): + if (any("__next__" in B.__dict__ for B in C.__mro__) and + any("__iter__" in B.__dict__ for B in C.__mro__)): return True return NotImplemented Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_collections.py ============================================================================== --- python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_collections.py (original) +++ python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_collections.py Mon Nov 29 04:56:12 2010 @@ -356,8 +356,14 @@ for x in samples: self.assertIsInstance(x, Iterator) self.assertTrue(issubclass(type(x), Iterator), repr(type(x))) - self.validate_abstract_methods(Iterator, '__next__') - self.validate_isinstance(Iterator, '__next__') + self.validate_abstract_methods(Iterator, '__next__', '__iter__') + + # Issue 10565 + class NextOnly: + def __next__(self): + yield 1 + raise StopIteration + self.assertNotIsInstance(NextOnly(), Iterator) def test_Sized(self): non_samples = [None, 42, 3.14, 1j, Modified: python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS ============================================================================== --- python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS (original) +++ python/branches/py3k/Misc/NEWS Mon Nov 29 04:56:12 2010 @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ Library ------- +- Issue #10565: The collections.Iterator ABC now checks for both + __iter__ and __next__. + - Issue #10242: Fixed implementation of unittest.ItemsEqual and gave it a new more informative name, unittest.CountEqual.
participants (1)
-
raymond.hettinger