[3.12] gh-110893: Improve the documentation for __future__ module (GH-114642) (#114702)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d14003adf267dc09f5a245235ad1fc25888... commit: d14003adf267dc09f5a245235ad1fc25888b8848 branch: 3.12 author: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> committer: hauntsaninja <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com> date: 2024-01-29T09:46:48Z summary: [3.12] gh-110893: Improve the documentation for __future__ module (GH-114642) (#114702) gh-110893: Improve the documentation for __future__ module (GH-114642) nedbat took issue with the phrasing "real module". I'm actually fine with that phrasing, but I do think the `__future__` page should be clear about the way in which the `__future__` module is special. (Yes, there was a footnote linking to the future statements part of the reference, but there should be upfront discussion). I'm sympathetic to nedbat's claim that no one really cares about `__future__._Feature`, so I've moved the interesting table up to the top. (cherry picked from commit 3b86891fd69093b60141300862f278614ba80613) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com> files: M Doc/library/__future__.rst diff --git a/Doc/library/__future__.rst b/Doc/library/__future__.rst index d261e4a4f338a5..762f8b4695b3dd 100644 --- a/Doc/library/__future__.rst +++ b/Doc/library/__future__.rst @@ -8,20 +8,68 @@ -------------- -:mod:`__future__` is a real module, and serves three purposes: +Imports of the form ``from __future__ import feature`` are called +:ref:`future statements <future>`. These are special-cased by the Python compiler +to allow the use of new Python features in modules containing the future statement +before the release in which the feature becomes standard. + +While these future statements are given additional special meaning by the +Python compiler, they are still executed like any other import statement and +the :mod:`__future__` exists and is handled by the import system the same way +any other Python module would be. This design serves three purposes: * To avoid confusing existing tools that analyze import statements and expect to find the modules they're importing. -* To ensure that :ref:`future statements <future>` run under releases prior to - 2.1 at least yield runtime exceptions (the import of :mod:`__future__` will - fail, because there was no module of that name prior to 2.1). - * To document when incompatible changes were introduced, and when they will be --- or were --- made mandatory. This is a form of executable documentation, and can be inspected programmatically via importing :mod:`__future__` and examining its contents. +* To ensure that :ref:`future statements <future>` run under releases prior to + Python 2.1 at least yield runtime exceptions (the import of :mod:`__future__` + will fail, because there was no module of that name prior to 2.1). + +Module Contents +--------------- + +No feature description will ever be deleted from :mod:`__future__`. Since its +introduction in Python 2.1 the following features have found their way into the +language using this mechanism: + ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| feature | optional in | mandatory in | effect | ++==================+=============+==============+=============================================+ +| nested_scopes | 2.1.0b1 | 2.2 | :pep:`227`: | +| | | | *Statically Nested Scopes* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| generators | 2.2.0a1 | 2.3 | :pep:`255`: | +| | | | *Simple Generators* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| division | 2.2.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`238`: | +| | | | *Changing the Division Operator* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| absolute_import | 2.5.0a1 | 3.0 | :pep:`328`: | +| | | | *Imports: Multi-Line and Absolute/Relative* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| with_statement | 2.5.0a1 | 2.6 | :pep:`343`: | +| | | | *The "with" Statement* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| print_function | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`3105`: | +| | | | *Make print a function* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| unicode_literals | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`3112`: | +| | | | *Bytes literals in Python 3000* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| generator_stop | 3.5.0b1 | 3.7 | :pep:`479`: | +| | | | *StopIteration handling inside generators* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ +| annotations | 3.7.0b1 | TBD [1]_ | :pep:`563`: | +| | | | *Postponed evaluation of annotations* | ++------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ + +.. XXX Adding a new entry? Remember to update simple_stmts.rst, too. + .. _future-classes: .. class:: _Feature @@ -65,43 +113,6 @@ dynamically compiled code. This flag is stored in the :attr:`_Feature.compiler_flag` attribute on :class:`_Feature` instances. -No feature description will ever be deleted from :mod:`__future__`. Since its -introduction in Python 2.1 the following features have found their way into the -language using this mechanism: - -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| feature | optional in | mandatory in | effect | -+==================+=============+==============+=============================================+ -| nested_scopes | 2.1.0b1 | 2.2 | :pep:`227`: | -| | | | *Statically Nested Scopes* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| generators | 2.2.0a1 | 2.3 | :pep:`255`: | -| | | | *Simple Generators* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| division | 2.2.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`238`: | -| | | | *Changing the Division Operator* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| absolute_import | 2.5.0a1 | 3.0 | :pep:`328`: | -| | | | *Imports: Multi-Line and Absolute/Relative* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| with_statement | 2.5.0a1 | 2.6 | :pep:`343`: | -| | | | *The "with" Statement* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| print_function | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`3105`: | -| | | | *Make print a function* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| unicode_literals | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | :pep:`3112`: | -| | | | *Bytes literals in Python 3000* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| generator_stop | 3.5.0b1 | 3.7 | :pep:`479`: | -| | | | *StopIteration handling inside generators* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| annotations | 3.7.0b1 | TBD [1]_ | :pep:`563`: | -| | | | *Postponed evaluation of annotations* | -+------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+ - -.. XXX Adding a new entry? Remember to update simple_stmts.rst, too. - .. [1] ``from __future__ import annotations`` was previously scheduled to become mandatory in Python 3.10, but the Python Steering Council @@ -115,3 +126,6 @@ language using this mechanism: :ref:`future` How the compiler treats future imports. + + :pep:`236` - Back to the __future__ + The original proposal for the __future__ mechanism.
participants (1)
-
hauntsaninja