Mailman 3 April 2011 - python-committers

anyone still have access to the coverity scan results?
by Brett Cannon Aug. 20, 2012

Aug. 20, 2012

Access to the Python results is currently down, but has anyone actually accessed the Coverity scan results any time recently? Or who even has access anymore?

9 20

Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion
by Antoine Pitrou April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

Sorry, reply initially sent off-list. -------- Message transféré -------- De: Antoine Pitrou <solipsis(a)pitrou.net> À: Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky(a)gmail.com> Sujet: Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:58:50 +0200 > When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was done > in a way that preserved the history of that file going back to 2002. Can you be more precise? How did you do that? > However, hg log of this file starts with my commit about a year ago. > Is it possible to re-add the old history? We cannot "add" any past history in any case. > The history of datetime.py > is very helpful for understanding various design decisions implemented > in that module. I would advise to document design decisions in source code comments or in a separate file. Having to dig in VCS logs, or read many tracker entries, is IMO too tedious.

9 21

History lost in svn to hg conversion
by Alexander Belopolsky April 25, 2011

April 25, 2011

I am not sure where to report such issues, so I'll post it here. Please advise if another list is more appropriate. When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was done in a way that preserved the history of that file going back to 2002. However, hg log of this file starts with my commit about a year ago. Is it possible to re-add the old history? The history of datetime.py is very helpful for understanding various design decisions implemented in that module. This history is discussed in various issues on the tracker (see for example, issue2267) and these discussions now have broken links.

1 0

Python Language Summit at EuroPython: 19th June
by Michael Foord April 16, 2011

April 16, 2011

Hello all, This is an invite to all core-python developers, and developers of alternative implementations, to attend the Python Language Summit at EuroPython. The summit will be on June 19th and EuroPython this year will be held at the beautiful city of Florence in Italy. http://ep2011.europython.eu/ If you are not a core-Python developer but would like to attend then please email me privately and I will let you know if spaces are available. If you are a core developer, or you have received a direct invitation, then please respond by private email to let me know if you are able to attend. A maybe is fine, you can always change your mind later. Attending for only part of the day is fine. We expect the summit to run from 10am - 4pm with appropriate breaks. Like previous language summits it is an opportunity to discuss topics like, Python 3 adoption, PEPs and changes for Python 3.3, the future of Python 2.7, documentation, package index, web site, etc. If you have topics you'd like to discuss at the language summit please let me know. Volunteers for taking notes at the language summit, for posting to Python-dev and the Python Insiders blog after the event, would be much appreciated. All the best, Michael Foord N.B. Due to my impending doom (oops, I mean impending fatherhood) I am not yet 100% certain I will be able to attend. If I can't I will arrange for someone else to chair. -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

1 0

Contributor Agreement - Clemens
by Kurt B. Kaiser April 10, 2011

April 10, 2011

We received a contributor agreement from William Edward Stuart Clemens by postal mail. I am mailing it to our Secretary. -- KBK

1 0

Committer rights for Nadeem Vawda
by Antoine Pitrou April 10, 2011

April 10, 2011

Hello, I'd like to propose giving committer rights to Nadeem Vawda. He has submitted a number of patches since the beginning of the year, culminating with a complete rewrite of BZ2File in pure Python allowing to add new features (such as the support for arbitrary file-like objects) and maintain the code much more easily. His name appears on 11 commits in the default branch. Regards Antoine.

16 30

Fwd: [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 2.7 -> 2.7): hg pull/merge - Changes to accomodate.
by Senthil Kumaran April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

The below changes were from Alexander Belopolsky. When I tried to push my changes, my changes resulted in multiple heads in 2.7, so I had to go back 2.7 branch, merge 2.7 and then commit and push. This resulted in both my changes as well as merged changes being pushed. I understand that the second part should not happen, like merging an already available change and then pushing it again. I have a script which kind of traverses all the local directories of branches and does a hg pull; hg update before I start making changes and I thought that was enough. How could the push would resulted in two heads here and why I did have merge ? ( I am unable to traceback the steps) and if there is anything I should know, or change in the workflow when doing changes to 2.7, please let me know. Thanks, Senthil ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: senthil.kumaran <python-checkins(a)python.org> Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM Subject: [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 2.7 -> 2.7): hg pull/merge - Changes to accomodate. To: python-checkins(a)python.org http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/da212fa62fea changeset: 69170:da212fa62fea branch: 2.7 parent: 69169:1320f29bcf98 parent: 69165:202a9feb1fd6 user: Senthil Kumaran <orsenthil(a)gmail.com> date: Wed Apr 06 14:41:42 2011 +0800 summary: hg pull/merge - Changes to accomodate. files: Lib/test/test_datetime.py | 7 +++++++ Modules/datetimemodule.c | 15 ++++++++------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_datetime.py b/Lib/test/test_datetime.py --- a/Lib/test/test_datetime.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_datetime.py @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ eq(a//10, td(0, 7*24*360)) eq(a//3600000, td(0, 0, 7*24*1000)) + # Issue #11576 + eq(td(999999999, 86399, 999999) - td(999999999, 86399, 999998), + td(0, 0, 1)) + eq(td(999999999, 1, 1) - td(999999999, 1, 0), + td(0, 0, 1)) + + def test_disallowed_computations(self): a = timedelta(42) diff --git a/Modules/datetimemodule.c b/Modules/datetimemodule.c --- a/Modules/datetimemodule.c +++ b/Modules/datetimemodule.c @@ -1737,13 +1737,14 @@ if (PyDelta_Check(left) && PyDelta_Check(right)) { /* delta - delta */ - PyObject *minus_right = PyNumber_Negative(right); - if (minus_right) { - result = delta_add(left, minus_right); - Py_DECREF(minus_right); - } - else - result = NULL; + /* The C-level additions can't overflow because of the + * invariant bounds. + */ + int days = GET_TD_DAYS(left) - GET_TD_DAYS(right); + int seconds = GET_TD_SECONDS(left) - GET_TD_SECONDS(right); + int microseconds = GET_TD_MICROSECONDS(left) - + GET_TD_MICROSECONDS(right); + result = new_delta(days, seconds, microseconds, 1); } if (result == Py_NotImplemented) -- Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython _______________________________________________ Python-checkins mailing list Python-checkins(a)python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins -- Senthil

5 4

Keyword expansion in online PEPs
by Barry Warsaw April 5, 2011

April 5, 2011

I'm still a little confused about keyword expansion for PEPs. Georg says here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-March/001572.html that he's enabled the extension "locally", but I don't quite understand if that means he did it only in his copy of the repo, or on python.org. Clearly, keywords are not getting expanded in the online version of the PEP: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0396/ and while I'm not sure if .hg/hgrc is version controlled in ssh://hg@hg.python.org/peps, the file there definitely does not have the keyword extension enabled. This pages recommends it be enabled only per-repo, not globally: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/KeywordExtension I think we want keywords to be expanded in the online version of the PEPs. How can we make that happen and what do PEP authors need to do? -Barry

4 5