On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 12:09, Brett Cannon wrote:
> The implementation for PEP 488 is basically done (sans Windows installer
> stuff). I did the work in a features repo at
> https://hg.python.org/features/pep-488/ . Once I have addressed reviewer
> comments at http://bugs.python.org/issue23731 , would people prefer I
> simply push the features repo to hg.python.org/cpython and have the more
> granular history but have various "merge default" commits, or would
> people
> rather I do one massive commit?

I tend to prefer the one massive commit especially if there's a lot of
"in progress" commits in the branch. It makes for cleaner and
more-transactional history.