-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 29.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 12:24 +0000, Vinay Sajip a écrit :
So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we will fix them and put in another rc.
+1.
When we say "release candidate", surely that implies no known serious brokenness. Even if we have to go back to calling it beta (Marc-Andre's point), surely there's no harm in that, as long as it's made clear that it wouldn't be a free-for-all for other patches to go in?
Okay, I don't mind if mailbox gets "fixed", but -1 on making the release schedule any longer because of that. OTOH, if mailbox *needs* a lengthening of the release schedule, then it's 3.3 material (or 3.2.1, depending on the other RM's view :-)).
Not if it's a few days, otherwise I'd agree.
Georg