-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 29.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 12:24 +0000, Vinay Sajip a écrit :
So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we will fix them and put in another rc.
When we say "release candidate", surely that implies no known serious brokenness. Even if we have to go back to calling it beta (Marc-Andre's point), surely there's no harm in that, as long as it's made clear that it wouldn't be a free-for-all for other patches to go in?
Okay, I don't mind if mailbox gets "fixed", but -1 on making the release schedule any longer because of that. OTOH, if mailbox *needs* a lengthening of the release schedule, then it's 3.3 material (or 3.2.1, depending on the other RM's view :-)).
Not if it's a few days, otherwise I'd agree.