On 5/2/2017 2:36 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 2017-05-02 20:28, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/2/2017 10:07 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:36:02 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" mal@egenix.com wrote:
IMO, it's much easier for everyone to just always point people to BPO for discussions and keep PRs reserved for code reviews.
I agree with Mark-Andre here. It will take effort on our part to make our culture be "discuss on BPO", but it will produce a much superior history to what github PRs produce, so I think it is worth it.
It would easier to move discussion to bpo if there were a clickable link from PR to bpo, just as there is in the opposite direction. I believe that there is a workflow issue to add this, but last I knew, it was bogged down in where to put the link, or something.
All recent PRs have a clickable link to BPO. It's in the box with CI results.
Not until one clicks 'Show all checks'. This is rather obscure. Who would know? Thanks for the info.
Click on "Details" for "bedevere/issue-number".
Neither was it obvious to me that 'details' takes me to the issue, rather than revealing a clickable issue-number, so that I need to middle click to open a new tab.
So this is still considerable friction.
tjr