On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:56 PM Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:

If you choose to merge, I would prefer that you rebase your changes
before to avoid multiple merges. IMO the best to avoid merges at all
:-)

It's sounding like one massive patch is the best option for people.

Did someone review your large change?

It just went up earlier today, so no. It's actually a fairly simple patch, it's just there was a lot of files involved that had some comment mentioning .pyo files.

-Brett

Victor

2015-04-01 18:09 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <bcannon@gmail.com>:
> The implementation for PEP 488 is basically done (sans Windows installer
> stuff). I did the work in a features repo at
> https://hg.python.org/features/pep-488/ . Once I have addressed reviewer
> comments at http://bugs.python.org/issue23731 , would people prefer I simply
> push the features repo to hg.python.org/cpython and have the more granular
> history but have various "merge default" commits, or would people rather I
> do one massive commit?
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>