May 3, 2017
4:18 a.m.
Le 03/05/2017 à 10:06, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On 3 May 2017 at 05:09, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote:
This doesn't have much to do with UX/UI. It's mainly a questions of culture.
It's about the UI/UX for me, as Roundup is missing a few modern collaboration features:
- Easy user mentions: I can't just mention someone inline based on autocompletion, I have to go up and add them to the nosy list
- Easy issue mentions: I don't get autocompletion pop-ups for issue cross-references to help fill in the right ones
- Easy editing: if I post incorrect information, or the goal of an issue changes, that gets buried in a subsequent correction post
- Easy formatting: RoundUp is plaintext only, with no ReST or Markdown support
- Easy reactions: no native +1 support to avoid "Usenet nod syndrome" without spamming folks following the issue
One growing gripe I have with Github is that their UI has become quite slow to load and render in recent years. It's become a bit grinding to navigate through issues or load long-winded discussions. bpo by contrast is quite snappy (probably by virtue of having a more rudimentary UI, of course).
As for "native" +1 mentions in Github, I tend to find them unhelpful, as I don't know why people say "+1" at all. So I usually ignore them.
Regards
Antoine.