On Wed, Apr 25, 2012, at 03:08 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
Hi,
Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be seen from (part of) its contributions below:
[snip]
He writes good code, has good ideas, is reactive to comments and reviews, and he's actually the original multiprocessing author (and he's one of the few contributors competent under both Unix and Windows).
Therefore, I think it would definitely make sense to give him commit rights.
What do you think?
Cheers,
cf
Uh, Wow. Yes. He should have commit rights - he was granted them when the multiprocessing pep was approved, but then vanished for several years (myself and others tried getting a hold of him). Lack of any contributor agreement or response from him is actually why the header files for multiprocessing including the specific license due to lack of contributor agreement from him.
He should have commit rights: In fact I'd love to talk to him offline about where he went off to! I assumed he was gone-gone!
Jesse
Guido mentioned him at the 2011 Language Summit as a vanished contributor that we'd really like to get an agreement from.
+1
-- KBK