On 26 January 2017 at 10:17, Berker Peksağ email@example.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Raymond Hettinger firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I volunteer to continue to provide mentorship and assistance to her as needed after she is granted commit rights.
I'd like to see some triaging, code review and more work on complicated patches first.
While I don't have hard data to back it up, my suspicion would be that we have more simple patches pending than we do complicated ones.
I reviewed some of Mariatta's patches and they needed at least two review rounds to meet our documentation guidelines. See http://bugs.python.org/issue26149 for a recent example.
With Raymond volunteering as mentor, I think an approach where changes are still reviewed, but it's Mariatta that does the final commit would work.
That would be pretty similar to the way things worked when I recommended Yury for commit privileges - at the start, the only thing that changed was that the final step in the review process changed from "wait until I find time to commit the change" to "looks good to me, go ahead and make the change".