On Nov 3, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Antoine Pitrou <email@example.com> wrote:Huh, I found the experience exactly the opposite. I was just remarking last night how glad I was that the discussion happened in discourse instead of on the mailing list, because of how poorly I felt the discussion would have gone on a mailing list. The ability to trivially multi quote alone was a drastic improvement, much less the ability to control, on a topic by topic basis, what level of notification I wanted for that topic.
Le 03/11/2018 à 16:19, Stefan Krah a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 07:22:21AM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 11/03/2018 03:55 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
Frankly, I feel pretty disenfranchised by the process
at the moment.
I wouldn't go as far as disenfranchised, but just this thread made it clear
to me that taking in information is at least 10x faster if presented on a
Discourse feels like eating soup with a fork, especially now that the
volume is higher.
Indeed. As soon as a discussion is starting to become branchy,
Discourse just ruins readability compared to a normal threaded
discussion system. The electoral system discussion is an example of that:
Perhaps the difference is in that every mail client I’ve ever used presents mailing list threads (or any thread) as a singular flat stream anyways? To be honest, I find the threaded views on like hyper kitty or piper mail to be abysmal anyways :|