-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:08 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
You're absolutely right and that sounds good. I will update the PEP accordingly. Martin, Ronald, Sean, what timezones are you in? I am US/Eastern.
I'm in CET (Central European), that GMT+2 in DST, and GMT+1 otherwise.
Got it, thanks.
As for Sean: Sean and me had agreed that we won't do RPMs anymore for 2.5.x. Maybe we need to reconsider now, but my view is that binary
RPMs typically fit a very specific OS release only (e.g. some version of Redhat); all the other RPM-using distributions (SuSE etc) couldn't use it. So compared to the value, the effort is too big.
Yep, Sean said he didn't have time to do the RPMs this time, and I
agree completely, the effort is too big for the value. I've nixed the
RPM steps from PEP 101.