On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ernest W. Durbin III <ernest@python.org> wrote:
Antoine noted the same lack of transparency at https://discuss.python.org/t/2019-steering-council-election-results/824/3?u=ewdurbin.

Ultimately I chose to initial publish results ASAP at the minimum granularity necessary given that there wasn’t direction on what level of detail should be published. I agree that transparency is key here, but as it wasn’t specified on in 8016/13/8100 I went with what we have.

I can open a PR to 8100 with detailed results if no objections are heard.

I would wait until you have explicit permission from every candidate. (You probably will have to reach out to some.) I hereby grant you mine.

--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)