On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 04:54 Stefan Richthofer <stefan.richthofer@gmail.com> wrote:
Again, this was in the (poorly conveyed) context of getting email
addresses for them, or at least being able to contact them.
I always thought there were already at least three places containing the necessary email addresses.
- python-committers should be exactly this mailing list.
The list also has email archiving services as well as duplicate emails for people (e.g. I'm in it twice so that if I accidentally send an email from a personal email address it doesn't get held up in moderation).
- according to https://devguide.python.org/coredev/#issue-tracker it is mandatory for core developers to subscribe to the issue tracker which AFAIK requires a confirmed email address.
- Every committer clearly must have signed the contributor agreement
https://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ which also contains a mandatory email field
So why is it still necessary to get email addresses at all?
Because none of those necessarily have accurate email addresses at this point. E.g. even python-committers has had people dropped off due to too many email rejections. And if we hold a vote for a governance model we will need a place to send ballots.
Now if the vote is open to any core developer (using MAL's definition of it being a lifetime title), then the subscription list for this mailing list is probably good enough with some manual grooming as long we are okay with long-dormant folk who predate this list not voting (which I'm personally fine with). But if we wanted a way to reach just people with commit privileges then that's a separate challenge.
-Brett
2018-08-02 10:59 GMT+02:00 Eric V. Smith <eric@trueblade.com>:
On 8/2/2018 3:32 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 02.08.2018 03:24, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 8/1/2018 8:32 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
I think it would also be a good idea to include core developers of other Python implementations in such a document, in separate sections, e.g. for Jython, IronPython, PyPy, Stackless, etcHmm, I don't think it is should be our (CPython) responsibility to keep track and maintain the list of the core devs of alternate Python implementations. Don't they have their own community / website? They have their own repo, bug tracker, governance model, and everything, right?
Agreed. We have a hard enough time keeping track of our own core developers.
I don't really think we have a hard time doing this. The only problem is that we never sat down and actually properly recorded this in one place.
I was specifically thinking of a way to stay in touch with core devs, or more specifically a way to send them email. In the past, before we moved to github, I took it upon myself to find email addresses (current or not) for all core devs, and I gave up without much success.
I agree that we could probably come up with a list of names for people who have been given the "core dev" status.
For our core devs, can't we just say that the CPython core devs are
those with commit bits on the CPython repo? I realize that will eliminate some people who have been core developers and never moved to github, but if they bring it to our attention, we can add them easily enough.
As discussed before, being a core developer is a status you gain and never lose. There is a clear difference between have commit rights to the (current) repo and this status.
Agreed. Again, this was in the (poorly conveyed) context of getting email addresses for them, or at least being able to contact them.
Eric
python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/