I have not responded before since Guido's approval seems sufficient ;-).On 5/8/2013 4:44 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
So I guess I can move forward with this unless there are objections in the next day or two,
The main concrete step is that one of the repository supervisors add his access key.409, not 309: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0409/
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> wrote:
On May 03, 2013, at 08:59 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored PEP
>309,You, Barry, and Guido, who have also worked on enum, know him best and are the principle supporters of this proposal. I gather that you all agree that he has shown the 'cooperativeness' necessary to a collective project.
has been very helpful in the Enum saga (and is the de-facto author of
>the current reference implementation),As 'stoneleaf', he has been active on 12 issues since June 2010 (nosy on 2 more). One patch is open and 5 have been applied (3 by Nick, 1 each by Antoine and R. David), I would say that the enum code, which appears to be on the way to acceptance, is equivalent to a few more typical issue patches.
and has also been active on the tracker for a couple of years (username stoneleaf).
FWIW, This is enough for a +1 from me.That is the enum PEP. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0435/
I think he has already
>signed the contributor agreement, and explicitly expressed interest to
>contribute directly to PEP 435.
I consider a (nontrivial) reference implementation to be a direct contribution even if he has not yet been pushing text changes.--
+1 for Ethan.>Any objections?
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers