March 30, 2013
12:25 p.m.
On 03/30/2013 06:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le samedi 30 mars 2013 à 10:13 -0700, Ned Deily a écrit :
In article <20130330141534.44893250BDD@webabinitio.net>, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head).
3.1?
Or 2.6? I also don't know what "which is its own head" is supposed to mean :-)
Whatever :) Policy is, and always was, that security fixes are coordinated and committed to old branches by the release manager for that branch.
Georg