On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 15:50 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 10/6/2017 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the first 5
> have "awaiting" labels. Would people object if I back-filled those open
> issues lacking an "awaiting" label? For those that have a "changes
> requested" review a comment that said roughly "we noticed there's a
> review asking for changes; if you already did that then let us know by
> saying 'I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition' and we will update this
> pull request accordingly" (the other stages don't have potential
> false-positives).
>
> The reason I'm asking before coding this up and running it is there will
> be some churn in notifications for those issues that get a comment about
> "awaiting changes".

Could you do, for instance, a page a day, so people are less likely to
be overwhelmed by (and ignore) a big batch?

Yes, the work could be smeared across multiple days.