6 Nov
2018
6 Nov
'18
1:18 a.m.
Le 05/11/2018 à 23:08, Victor Stinner a écrit :
Le sam. 3 nov. 2018 à 10:39, Antoine Pitrou antoine@python.org a écrit :
I'm unhappy with the "[] Further discussion" choice. We have a governance crisis. Many people would like to see it resolved as soon as possible, I don't see the ability to vote for "[] Further discussion" as a way to resolve this crisis.
Why are you worried? If many people would like to see the "crisis" (I would call it a void) resolved early, then probably "Further discussion" won't win. So how is its presence a problem?
PEPs cannot be approved since July.
Let me repeat the question: if "Further discussion" has no chance of winning, why are you bothered by its presence?
Regards
Antoine.