-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
There's an option missing in that survey:
[ ] I see a need to switch to a DVCS at all.
To be fair, the survey isn't asking about a switch, just how they
compare against svn.But I must admin that seems a little strange; while I just answered
that I believe hg and bzr are better than svn (I abstained re git), that
*doesn't* necessarily imply I would vote that they should replace svn for
Python - I might, but I might not - that is a much harder question than the one presented.
Note that not switching from svn on the backend, but still allowing
access with bzr, hg, and git is also an option. And there are two
subcategories of that: we provide mirrors of svn branches in the
native format, and we do nothing, allowing the dvcs's use their svn-
bridges to access the branches. Although I think in either case we
could provide hosting support for core committers.
Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSaXcSXEjvBPtnXfVAQLreQP/c06y3vUTLqhGJrKgiWvajWy6p96kqQ8o 6WcYp9XXXoDRHsZNFRm8z3Ck+aRCEEB3CmINHSCYdMxR9m43YhwHO/IEjtq6/+WG c0LtqXt+BrpfX2UvwG5LVmA4YMR35tnEzMlPNJaWLd8s2NbKyK8Gamnzc6aNhDap ltNiwPlMDew= =w48j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----