On 28 June 2015 at 00:47, Serhiy Storchaka storchaka@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.06.15 14:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I also added you to the nosy list for the contextlib issue that Serhiy originally pinged me about :)
The patch already was approved by you. I reviewed the patch and it LGTM too. I pinged you only because the issue is assigned to you. If you trust me, just reassign the issue to me and I'll commit the patch.
That's a good point - I had a range of issues assigned to me where I'd been telling myself "I'll get to that soon" for months, and instead kept finding other tasks to work on that I considered higher priority. That's a bad thing for me to be doing, as it ends up blocking other people from deciding they're interested in working on those issues and moving them forward.
I've now reset the assignee on all such issues to accurately reflect the fact I'm not currently working on them. (A couple of those are test suite refactorings with patches already submitted, so mentors willing to pick them up would be greatly appreciated! If anyone has more time available than I do, http://bugs.python.org/issue9517 would a good place to start for that specific aspect)
I also dropped myself from the issue assignment list in the triaging guide - while I'm happy to help out with reviews, actually assigning me issues that aren't work or PEP 432 related is currently a good way to see them languish indefinitely :(
Regards, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia