-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Sep 14, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I thought this was the plan from the beginning: make sure that for
rc1, there aren't any blockers - not even deferred ones. All 3.0 blockers got deferred before 2.6rc1, but the 2.6 blockers stayed.In case you wonder where they all went - I "resolved" a number of them by declaring that they shouldn't really block the release; in most cases, people then agreed (or didn't object).
As a criterion, I asked "could that get fixed in 2.6.1 as well?", and I thought it could if
- it's not a regression wrt. 2.5, and
- it's not really that embarrassing, and
- fixing it won't violate the policies that we had established for bug fix releases.
Martin, I agree with your take on this, and Guido's follow up. Thanks.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSM5keHEjvBPtnXfVAQIGugQAkYDZatppkBTysc1+wJ1raamgBdIqFXA/ +/jUiEv6dRHIhfu+CqAhCD+M8h5sWl2iZ+VZaHqvgiJdv7nU1Zd+oQCp4Iw42rOP Eqy/bR1euBO3tQxqrq5UyFVZjCuYEIvwJP0odiFoa/ygc7J7/yuu2EEysG97Xgo7 urZRlZO2UGw= =T3PN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----