-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 30.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Georg Brandl firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
And why it does test with and without "module".
Because it always did (there's a thing called backwards compatibility.)
This is of course probably the obvious one to start a deprecation process.
But why do we check the long suffix for the *new* extension module naming variants from PEP 3149 and PEP 384? Those are completely new, so there's no backwards compatibility argument there.
It's for easy transition I guess -- you take the same module name and just tack on .abi3.so instead of .so.