-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
But I honestly think this discussion should wait until after we go final with 2.6/3.0. Once that happens and we are all not running around trying to get a release out, then we should start from the ground up and re-evaluate what we need to change. That includes the workflow in the issue tracker, how the buildbots are used, what our expected best practices are, cleaning up the test suite, how serious we are about moving to a distributed VCS, whether we want a PQM, do we want code reviews, etc. But I really think we should be putting the time in now to b3 and working towards hitting final before we delve into this lengthy conversation.
Thanks for the nice summary Brett. I completely agree with you that
any changes in process should happen after 2.6/3.0. I'll now go back
to harassing people old skool. :)
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSKR3lXEjvBPtnXfVAQLA2AQAkQZHoL4YH8Di+hKzq3nVdJXazSJPL1Va 5xFnobMmrjKYnvfIK1N50Vg/9pSzxLXVvU1OMYsJdoUnXq1NXaleBIfJbjdMtck5 9CULBncXnokD6IioUI410xhJIXsn/39Xw2INVGiO9GwHy9Y9NlkaEs7xvh8uOkP0 yC8P8+Phu6s= =/bFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----