Le 22/05/2018 à 22:06, Brett Cannon a écrit :
>
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 12:07 Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org
> <mailto:antoine@python.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Le 22/05/2018 à 20:58, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> >
> >> Thoughts? (We can dogfood this proposal too, if there's interest. :-)
> >
> > I don't know whether this will help focus rambling PEP
> discussions. I personally don't love the linearity of GH comments.
> Threading is useful!
>
> What has become of the Discourse experiment?
>
>
> A Discourse experiment was never started. If you mean Zulip it's still
> going at python.zulipchat.com <http://python.zulipchat.com>.
I meant this, whatever it was: https://discuss.python.org/ :-)
Ah, that never went anywhere because it was just a short experiment that the overload-sig did. If people wanted to do a serious experiment with it then we can discuss it over on core-workflow.
I don't think Zulip works for structured discussion. I also find it
slightly less usable than I expected.
Why specifically? Do you still find IRC more usable? Just trying to understand how Discourse would be different enough to solve the issue you're having.
-Brett
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/