April 26, 2017
11:51 p.m.
On 4/27/2017 1:52 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 04/26/2017 10:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/26/2017 1:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
:) But they are at least executed which is what we're really measuring here and I think all Ethan and I are advocating for.
I thought Ethan was advocating for more -- a specific unittest for each line.
I'm hoping that's just poor wording, or each module would need hundreds of tests. ;)
Poor wording, but I was wrong in any case. An aspirational goal is that each line of of each function be exercised for correctness by at least one unittest. For top-level code not in a function or class, we mostly have to settle for compile and run without error.