2017-01-21 20:51 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon brett@python.org:
What I'm picking up from this is (as a gross oversimplification):
- Victor _wants_ code reviews
- Raymond thinks we _need_ code reviews
For a concrete example, I wrote a patch for a major regression in the datetime module at 2017-01-04: http://bugs.python.org/issue29100
I'm waiting for a review. To be honest, I almost forgot this issue since I didn't get any feedback. I didn't get any review. In the meanwhile, a duplicate was opened: http://bugs.python.org/issue29346
Usually, when this case occurs, I push my patch without review. But since some developers wrote that the want to review, please take a look at timestamp_limits.patch of http://bugs.python.org/issue29100 !
"timestamp_limits.patch is waiting for your review! This issue is a major regression of Python 3.6. I'm going to push the patch in one week if I don't get any review."
Victor